NuReDrain Highlights and Achievements – Update May 2021
Plants need nutrients, such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), to grow. Therefore, nutrients are used in agriculture. The excess of nutrients end up in the water and deteriorate the water quality. The NUREDRAIN project wants to tackle this problem by testing filter technologies which can trap N and P.
The Nuredrain project considers 3 N removal technologies: 1/ a MBBR (= moving bed bio reactor); 2/ a ZVI (= zero valent iron) filter and 3/ a mobile constructed wetland.
Greenhouse effluent has been treated with a DIY MBBR (= do-it-yourself moving bed bio reactor) filter. An average removal efficiency of 75% could be achieved. Also drainage water can be treated with an MBBR. The configuration of the MBBR filter for drainage water depends of the flow and N concentration. Average removal efficiency varies between 60 and 95%. The ZVI filter also results in a successful N removal being on average 94%. The mobile constructed wetland has been installed along a ditch. The microbial community is currently developing in the biofilm.
The Nuredrain project also considers 4 P removal technologies: 1/ a P filterbox; 2/ a sediment filter combined with a reactive filter; 3/ an inline drain P filter and 4/ a filter column.
Drainage water treated with the P filterbox achieves a 80-100% P removal. After 2 years of operation, the filter efficiency decreases towards 50%. The associated filter material used is ICS (= iron coated sand). This filter material has also been tested for P removal in greenhouse effluent. ICS showed to be a very good P adsorbent as 99% P could be removed. When a lot of sediments are present in the drainage water, it is recommended to trap the sediments first. A hydroseparator has been trialed for this in Denmark but the functioning is not yet optimal. Also drainage water in Germany can be very rich in amorphous organic matter. This requires a prefilter to be installed before the inline drain P filter. This filter is suitable to retain on average 53% of total P.
Around 40% of P can be desorbed from saturated filter material. The resulting P quantity is too low to be economically viable for P recovery. Desorption is nevertheless interesting to recover the filter material as such. ICS filter material saturated with P can also be used as a substrate (30%) for some plants (e.g. Chysanthemum and Chlorophytum).
Techno-economic evaluation of 3 nutrient filter systems revealed that these technologies are more cost effective as compared to current measures. This result will strengthen the discussion with national authorities.
Handy men and women can try to build themselves a MBBR by following the guidelines in the DIY MBBR manual. This manual is available in English and Dutch. The working principle of a MBBR is described in a separate manual. This includes a calculation tool to ensure a optimal design for your specific situation.
- Report #4: picture billboard LWK
- Report #5: Photo about the installation of the constructed wetland and wood chips basin at Inagro
- Report #5: Photos about the installation of the MBBR container at Staden (KUL + Inagro)
- Report #4: Number of sites managed using new solutions supporting long-term sustainability
- Report #4: 3 Written dissemination
- Report #4: 4 Video production of different filter systems
- Report #4: Video production of different filter systems (sub)
- Report #5: 2 Creation of communication tools
- Report #5: 3 Written dissemination
- Report #5: 2 P-desorption tests
- Report #5: 3 Impact modeling of measures in 2 catchments
- Report #7: 3 Test case drainage water in arable fields (1)
- Report #7: 4 Test case drainage water in arable fields (2)
- Report #7: 6 Test case Dümmer lake
- Report #7: 2 P-desorption tests
- Report #7: 6 Interlab excercise with tailored spores for P removal
- Report #8: 3 Written dissemination
- Report #8: 7 Manual on nutrient removal technologies